SKU: 48217605105

18.5V, Li-ion, 2600mAh, Lawn Mowers battery fits Gardena, Husqvarna, 584 82 28-01, Mahroboter Sileno, Mahroboter Sileno+, 48.10Wh

Sale price$34.35 Regular price$38.17
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $9.54 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jun 21 - Jun 26

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

18.5V, Li-ion, 2600mAh, Lawn Mowers battery fits Gardena, Husqvarna, 584 82 28-01, Mahroboter Sileno, Mahroboter Sileno+, 48.10WhCameron Sino CS HAT310VX Replacement Battery for Gardena, Husqvarna Lawn Mowers 2600mAh 48. 10Wh Unlock uninterrupted performance with the Cameron Sino CS HAT310VX replacement battery, designed specifically for Gardena, Husqvarna Lawn Mowers. This high quality 2600mAh 48. 10Wh Li ion battery delivers a reliable 18. 5V voltage with an energy rating of 48. 10Wh, ensuring your device operates at peak efficiency throughout extended sessions. Whatever you

18.5V, Li-ion, 2600mAh, Lawn Mowers battery fits Gardena, Husqvarna, 584 82 28-01, Mahroboter Sileno, Mahroboter Sileno+, 48.10Wh
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 48217605105

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 2087 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products